Skip to main content
· 1/26/1994

Porado v. State

Citations

  • 440 S.E.2d 690
  • 211 Ga. App. 728
  • 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 357
  • 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding deposit account fraud conviction after concluding that the state had made out a prima facie showing under OCGA § 16-9-20 (a) (2)
  • regular business practice of measuring gasoline consumed, calculating commission, and presenting invoice at end of week met requirement of contemporaneous transaction and present consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Beasley, Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.