Skip to main content
· 5/15/1929

Popsicle Corp. v. Weiss

Citations

  • 40 F.2d 301
  • 1 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 216
  • 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing when we will decline to address an under- developed argument
  • noting generally that “it is not this court’s function to speculate as to what a party’s argument might be” or “to make or develop a party’s argu- ment when that party has not endeavored to do so itself”
  • discussing when we will decline to address an under- developed argument
  • noting generally that “it is not this court’s function to speculate as to what a party’s argument 4 Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818) might be” or “to make or develop a party’s argument when that party has not endeavored to do so itself”
  • it is not “our proper function to make or develop a party’s argument when that party has not endeavored to do so itself”
  • “[I]t is not this court’s proper function to * * * develop a party’s argument when that party has not endeavored to do so itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ndy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.