Poppe v. Athearn
Citations
- 42 Cal. 606
Syllabus
<p>Failure to File Pre-emption Claim.—One who settles on unsurveyed public land as a preemptioner, but who fails to file with the Register of the proper Land Office his declaratory statement within three months after the plat of survey of the land is filed in the Register’s office, loses his preemption claim, as against one who in the meantime has taken the necessary steps to acquire the title to the land.</p> <p>Evidence -of Filing Paper.—An indorsement on the plat of the survey of public land, that it was filed in the Land Office on a day named therein, which is not signed by any one, will, in the absence of other evidence on the subject, be taken as fixing the time of filing the plat.</p> <p>Who can Complain oe Judgment.—A party to a judgment who has not appealed will not be heard to allege errors in the Court below.</p> <p>Per RHODES, J., NILES, J., concurring:</p> <p>Making Holder oe United States Title Trustee tor Holder of State Title to Land.—One who purchases public land from the State, as a part of the five hundred thousand acres to which it became entitled by the Act of Congress of April 4th, 1841, cannot claim the benefit of a patent for the same land, issued by the United States to another person as a preemption, and make him his trustee holding the legal title.</p> <p>Regulations for Disposal of Public Lands.—The Commissioner of the General Land Office has authority to make regulations respecting the disposal of the public lands, and such regulations, when not repugnant to the Acts of Congress, have the force and effect of laws.</p> <p>Consent of United States to Entry of Land by State.—A certificate of the Register of United States lands, issued to one who applies to him to locate a State land warrant on public land, that he approves of the location by the State, is a legal and valid consent of the United States to such location, because it is prescribed by the Commissioner of the General Land Office. It is also correct to surrender to the Register th
Judges: Crockett, Niles, Rhodes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shalabi v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2021-07-12· cited 47×
- Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Ninth Circuit· 1901-11-15· cited 43×
- Bachis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-09-16· cited 15×
- Hamblin v. State Board of Land Com'rsUtah Supreme Court· 1919-12-20· cited 8×
- Schieffery v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1885-12-16· cited 7×
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-07-10· cited 4×
- González v. CabreroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1915-04-16· cited 2×
- Rivera v. BrignoniSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1911-12-22· cited 1×
- Todd v. Asamblea Municipal de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1929-02-14· cited 1×
- Oakley v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court· 1878-07-01
- Oakley v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court· 1875-12-11
- Puig v. Succession of PolancoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1910-11-12
- Todd v. Municipal Assembly of San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1929-02-14
- Nazario Acosta v. Estado Libre AsociadoTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico· 1998-10-22
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Garland v. WynnSupreme Court· 1857-12-30· cited 33×
- Megerle v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court· 1867-07-15· cited 30×
- James v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1866-07-01· cited 14×
- Smith v. AthernCalifornia Supreme Court· 1868-07-01· cited 11×
- Verden v. ColemanSupreme Court· 1860-03-12· cited 10×
- Lucas v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-10-15· cited 9×
- Lyons v. LeimbackCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-07-01· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.