Skip to main content

Popovich v. Danielson

Citations

  • 896 N.E.2d 1196
  • 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 2548
  • 2008 WL 5006525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a physician’s battery of a patient “while he was evaluating [her] injuries” fell within the MMA
  • applying the prima facie error standard where a party failed to address an argument raised on appeal
  • MMA governed several of patient’s claims even though she filed them as torts, including assault and battery, defamation, and fraud
  • de novo review is appropriate where the trial court rules on a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and holds a hearing at which the parties present legal arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Popovich v. Danielson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.