Popoff v. Johnston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court had numerous opportunities to rule on pending matters and its delay in doing so was not attributable to petitioner
• holding that court had numerous opportunities to rule on pending matters and its delay in doing so was not attributable to petitioner
• eleven years to decide motion to withdraw guilty plea sufficient to excuse exhaustion requirement
• eleven years to decide motion to withdraw guilty plea sufficient to excuse exhaustion requirement
• eleven years to decide motion to withdraw guilty plea sufficient to excuse exhaustion 7 requirement
• the Circuit Court excused exhaustion of state remedies based on inordinate delay of nearly 11 years in deciding Hankins’s motion for withdrawal of guilty plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).