Pope v. Pope

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the due process requirements of section 741.30 and remanding for an evidentiary hearing where the trial court extended a temporary injunction without giving the respondent an opportunity to present his case
• “‘Due process requires that a party be given the opportunity to be heard and to testify and call witnesses on his behalf ..., and the denial of this right is fundamental error.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-24· cited 16×
• Kilnapp v. Kilnapp
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-04· cited 6×
• Orlando Sanchez v. City of West Palm Beach
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-09-03· cited 5×
• Lois Zelman v. Martin Zelman, Robert Zelman, Lisa Held and Curtis Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-02· cited 4×
• Fleming v. Demps
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-21· cited 3×
• Adili v. Adili
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-09· cited 2×
• Niederkorn v. Trivino
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-09-02· cited 2×
• Cirillo v. Jones
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-04· cited 1×
• Lee v. Lee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-27
• Sanchez v. Alviar
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pettry v. Pettry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-20· cited 24×
• Lewis v. Lewis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-20· cited 18×
• Miller v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-27· cited 8×
• Wooten v. Jackson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-10· cited 2×