Pope v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that factual sufficiency of the evidence is the \sole remittitur standard\
• explaining that an issue complaining about the amount the jury awarded requires the appeals court to resolve a factual dispute, and holding that the matter should not have been reviewed under a legal sufficiency standard
• explaining that factual sufficiency of the evidence is the “sole remittitur standard”
• explaining that factual sufficiency of the evidence is the “sole remittitur standard”
• indicating remittitur is appropriate where the jury’s finding is manifestly unjust, even without a showing that the jury was inflamed by passion, prejudice, or improper motive
• indicating remittitur is appropriate where the jury’s finding is manifestly unjust, even without a showing that the jury was inflamed by passion, prejudice, or improper motive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).