Skip to main content
· 3/3/1914

Pope v. Lyttle

Citations

  • 157 Ky. 659
  • 163 S.W. 1121
  • 1914 Ky. LEXIS 362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, if a court permits joinder of a non-diverse defendant after removal, the case must be remanded to state court
  • finding that conclusory statements in amended complaint suggested improper motive
  • finding no prejudice where 6 none of Plaintiff’s claims against non-diverse defendant appeared valid
  • considering also “the closeness of the relationship between the new and the old parties,” “the effect of an amendment on the court’s jurisdiction,” and “the new notice of the pending action’’
  • considering also “the closeness of the relationship between the new and the old parties,” “the effect of an amendment on the court’s jurisdiction,” and “the new party’s notice of the pending action”
  • finding no prejudice where none of plaintiff's claims against non-diverse defendant appeared valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.