Pope v. Ferguson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus to correct incidental rulings of a trial court when there is an adequate remedy by appeal, including orders sustaining or overruling pleas to the jurisdiction
• stating that appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus to correct incidental rulings of a trial court when there is an adequate remedy by appeal, including orders sustaining or overruling pleas to the jurisdiction
• \[W]e have consistently refused to issue writs of mandamus ... when the party applying has an adequate remedy by appeal.\
• \[A] writ [of mandamus] positively will not issue ... [where] there is an adequate remedy by appeal for correction.\
• “[W]e have consistently refused to issue writs of mandamus ... when the party applying has an adequate remedy by appeal.”
• “[A] writ [of mandamus] positively will not issue ... [where] there is an adequate remedy by appeal for correction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).