Skip to main content
· 1/18/2005

Pop v. Yarborough

Citations

  • 354 F. Supp. 2d 1132
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4811
  • 2005 WL 281220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “it does not appear 8 that Petitioner’s [due process] claim relating to his insanity defense is even cognizable under 9 habeas because sanity was not an element of the offenses for which he was convicted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matz, Walsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.