Skip to main content
· 2/23/1933

Poorman v. Fort Armstrong Automobile Underwriters

Citations

  • 269 Ill. App. 466
  • 1933 Ill. App. LEXIS 737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting stockbroker immunity for statements made to the SEC about a suspicion that a company was attempting to \bilk the public via the securities market\
  • granting stockbroker immunity for statements made to the SEC about a suspicion that a company was attempting to “bilk the public via the securities market”
  • granting stockbroker immunity for statements made to the SEC about a suspicion that a company was attempting to \bilk the public via the securities market\
  • “The plaintiffs assert specific reliance upon the Federal Tort Claims Act . . . but it is specifically provided by § 2679 of Title 28 of the United States Code that a federal agency is not to be sued thereunder[.]”
  • regulatory activities of the SEC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.