· 2/23/1933
Poorman v. Fort Armstrong Automobile Underwriters
Citations
- 269 Ill. App. 466
- 1933 Ill. App. LEXIS 737
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting stockbroker immunity for statements made to the SEC about a suspicion that a company was attempting to \bilk the public via the securities market\
- granting stockbroker immunity for statements made to the SEC about a suspicion that a company was attempting to “bilk the public via the securities market”
- granting stockbroker immunity for statements made to the SEC about a suspicion that a company was attempting to \bilk the public via the securities market\
- “The plaintiffs assert specific reliance upon the Federal Tort Claims Act . . . but it is specifically provided by § 2679 of Title 28 of the United States Code that a federal agency is not to be sued thereunder[.]”
- regulatory activities of the SEC
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.