Skip to main content
· 5/22/1939

Poore v. Edgar Bros. Co.

Citations

  • 33 Cal. App. 2d 6
  • 90 P.2d 808
  • 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • alleged defective design was the use of plain glass rather than safety glass in automobile door; demurrer upheld for defendant because “the glass in [automobile] windows is not intended to withstand blows as part of its ordinary use”
  • alleged defective design was the use of plain glass rather than safety glass in automobile door; demurrer upheld for defendant because \the glass in [automobile] windows is not intended to withstand blows as part of its ordinary use\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.