Pooley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the court held that the defendant's acquittal of possession of burglary tools estops the State from prosecuting the same defendant for unlawful breaking and entering a vehicle because the State would be attempting to relitigate a fact which underlies the prior acquittal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Daniels v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-11-26· cited 48×
• Parker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-06-30· cited 17×
• First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. Parsons Steel, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1987-08-21· cited 17×
• State Ex Rel. Tyson v. TED'S GAME ENTER.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2002-12-13· cited 11×
• Poole v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-08-12· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1987-08-21

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashe v. Swenson
  Supreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
• Burrell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-12-28· cited 20×
• State v. Lewis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-05-05· cited 17×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-10-23· cited 8×
• Murray v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1965-08-31· cited 3×