Skip to main content
· 12/23/1991

Poole v. Rourke

Citations

  • 779 F. Supp. 1546
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 1208
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19020
  • 1991 WL 284472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “lack of clarity in the substantive law” as a factor that supports a substantial 10 justification finding
  • Air Force not justified in discharging staff sergeant with 17 years of service without considering probation or rehabilitation
  • “It would be demeaning to justice and to respect for the non-monetary 3 concerns of former officers, for this court to hold that plaintiff’s claims for invalidity of his 4 conviction and discharge are necessarily masks for a subsequent claim of monetary relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Milton L. Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.