Poole v. Poole
Citations
- 96 Kan. 84
- 150 P. 592
- 1915 Kan. LEXIS 317
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Gifts — Personal Property of Husband — Right of Disposition. The general rule is that the law has placed no restriction or limitation on the husband’s right to make such disposition of his personal property during his lifetime as he may elect.</p> <p>2. Gifts — Colorable Gifts by Husband — Interest in Property Reserved— Invalid as against Widow. Where the transfer or gift is colorable and there is a voluntary transfer or conveyance by which the husband reserves to himself an interest in or a power to dispose of the property, it may be declared void as against the widow and she may participate in its distribution upon the theory that the title still remained in the husband at his death. •</p> <p>3. Gifts — Binding upon Grantor — Binding upon His Heirs. A widow sued as an heir of her deceased husband to set aside gifts and transfers of personal property made by him to the defendants, who are his sons by a former marriage. The transfers were made without the wife’s knowledge, when the husband was 83 years of age and possessed of no other property, and immediately following the dismissal of an .action brought by her for separate maintenance, that action having been settled upon his conveying to her certain real estate and agreeing to pay her a monthly allowance. The court found that he made the gifts and transfers to his sons in anticipation that he would not live long and to prevent the plaintiff from inheriting a share in the property as his widow, and in the further anticipation of the probability that the resumption of the marriage relation with plaintiff would not last long or be .permanent and that she might separate from him and bring another action for alimony or divorce, and to defeat her right to a division of his property, held, following Small v. Small, 56 Kan. i, 42 Pac. 323, 30 L. R. A. 243, 54 Am. St. Rep. 581, that the gifts to the sons not being colorable but absolute transfers of the'title to the property, binding up
Judges: Burch, Mason, Porter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ackers v. First National Bank of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1963-12-19· cited 33×
- Osborn v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-04-06· cited 13×
- State Bank v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas· 1919-03-08· cited 10×
- Newman Ex Rel. Ausemus v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-06-03· cited 9×
- Holzbeierlein v. HolzbeierleinD.C. Circuit· 1937-05-03· cited 3×
- Peoples Trust & Savings Bank v. HubbellTenth Circuit· 1939-03-17· cited 3×
- State Auto Property & Casualty v. LewisD. Kansas· 2014-03-19· cited 1×
- McKay v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1954-06-12· cited 1×
- Scott v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas· 1962-01-20
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dunnock v. DunnockMaryland Chancery Ct· 1852-09-15· cited 31×
- Stewart v. StewartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1824-07-15· cited 29×
- Coblentz v. PutiferSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-07-06· cited 17×
- Kerr v. KerrSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-07-07· cited 7×
- McKelvey v. McKelveySupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-12-12· cited 5×
- Jones v. SomervilleMississippi Supreme Court· 1900-10-15· cited 5×
- Gaston v. GastonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1910-07-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.