Poole v. Munday

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in a property case that two very similar violations of a contract were separate and distinct despite sharing a common root, and therefore recovery on the first violation did not preclude a later claim on the second violation
• holding in a property case that two very similar violations of a contract were separate and distinct despite sharing a common root, and therefore recovery on the first violation did not preclude a later claim on the second violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).