Poole v. Lowell Dunn Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant engaged in blasting activities, which the trial court found to be ultra-hazardous and subject to strict liability, was liable for the consequences of his conduct even though some other cause contributed to the same damage
• providing the jury with two contradictory charges on the same point is inherently confusing
• reversal mandated where instruction \misstated Florida law on causation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).