Poole v. Hurlbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that claims are abandoned when party fails to substantively brief them
• stating that claims are abandoned when party fails to substantively brief them
• stating that claims are abandoned when party fails to substantively brief them
• stating that claims are abandoned when a party fails to substantively brief them (citing Cinel v. Connick, 15 F.3d 1338, 1345 (5th Cir. 1994) (“A party who inadequately briefs an issue is considered to have abandoned the claim.”)
• “Summary judgment cannot be defeated through conclusional allegations and denials, speculation, improbable inferences, unsubstantiated assertions, and legalistic argumentation.” (quotations and alterations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).