Poole v. Harvey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the ABCMR’s decision to be arbitrary and capricious due to its failure to address the plaintiff’s non-frivolous and potentially meritorious argument
• “[T]he [review board] must respond to all non-frivolous arguments raised by the applicant. If the [board] does not respond to non-frivolous arguments, the [board]’s decision is arbitrary.”
• “It is a ‘fundamental rule of administrative law’ that a court reviewing an agency’s decision ‘must judge the propriety of [agency] action solely by the grounds invoked by the agency.’”
• the Board “must respond to all non-frivolous and potentially meritorious arguments an applicant raises”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).