Pool Company v. Otis L Cooper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in the absence of Chevron deference, pursuant to Mead the agency's interpretation is accorded respect under Skidmore according to its \power to persuade\
• in the absence of Chevron deference, pursuant to Mead the agency’s interpretation is accorded respect under Skidmore according to its “power to persuade”
• “We are entitled, but not required, to treat this concession as a binding judicial admission.” (citing City Nat’l Bank v. United States, 907 F.2d 536, 544 (5th Cir. 1990))
• “[N]o informal conference with the 2 Case: 18-60099 Document: 00514673395 Page: 3 Date Filed: 10/09/2018 No. 18-60099 Department of Labor ever took place. Under the law of our Circuit, that fact poses an absolute bar to an award of attorney’s fees under § 28(b).”
• \Mead 4 clarified that * * * [Chevron deference applies to an agency's interpretation only] when 'Congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force of law'\ (quoting United States v. Mead Corp. , 533 U.S. 218 , 226-227 (2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).