Pony Express Courier Corp. v. Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court abused its discretion by determining unconscionability without sufficient facts before trial court to determine if agreement was unconscionable as a whole
• holding that trial court abused its discretion by determining unconscionability without sufficient facts before trial court to determine if agreement was unconscionable as a whole
• implying that it is necessary to look at the provisions of an agreement as a whole to determine whether it is substantively unconscionable
• implying that it is necessary to look at the provisions of an agreement as a whole to determine whether it is substantively unconscionable
• stating that an appellate court reviews a trial court’s ruling on a mixed question of law and fact for an abuse of discretion
• asserting that discovery may be limited or eliminated in some arbitration agreements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).