Skip to main content
· 9/3/1998

Ponticelli v. Zurich American Insurance Group

Citations

  • 16 F. Supp. 2d 414
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13767
  • 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 181
  • 1998 WL 564012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over HRL claim in a Title VII action because of potential jury confusion and unsettled issue of state law
  • two-and-a-half months between protected activity and discipline “is hardly the close proximity of time” in establishing a causal link
  • “In the sexual harassment context, it appears that for an IIED claim to survive a summary judgment motion, sexual batteryshould be alleged.”
  • “[T]he unavailability of pretrial discovery . . . does not 17 render the forum inadequate.”
  • “[Defendant] cannot be deemed to be acting under color of state law by virtue of the fact that it is licensed to conduct business in New York.”
  • two and a half months is “hardly the close proximity of time contemplated . . . for allowing a plaintiff to establish the ‘causal connection’ element of [a] retaliation claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.