D. Rhode Island· 1/21/1992
Pontarelli v. Stone
Citations
- 781 F. Supp. 114
- 1992 WL 6005
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- attached as an appendix to In re Schiff
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torres
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tang v. Rhode Island Department of Elderly AffairsFirst Circuit· 1998-12-11· cited 114×
- Trooper Alvin T. Pontarelli v. Walter E. Stone, Ina P. SchiffFirst Circuit· 1992-11-04· cited 30×
- Matter of SchiffSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1996-10-24· cited 12×
- Rhode Island Medical Society v. WhitehouseD. Rhode Island· 2004-06-23· cited 9×
- Morin v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesD. New Hampshire· 1993-02-03· cited 9×
- Matter of SchiffSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1996-06-07· cited 7×
- O'ROURKE v. City of ProvidenceD. Rhode Island· 1999-12-07· cited 6×
- United Companies Lending Corp. v. SargeantD. Massachusetts· 1999-01-04· cited 6×
- Donnelly v. Rhode Island Board of Governors for Higher EducationD. Rhode Island· 1996-11-26· cited 3×
- Fusco v. MedeirosD. Rhode Island· 1996-08-06· cited 3×
- Bennie Sisto, as the Trustee of Goat Island Realty Trust v. America Condominium Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2016-06-29· cited 3×
- Pontarelli v. Stone, SchiffFirst Circuit· 1992-11-04
- Tang v. Rhode IslandFirst Circuit· 1998-12-11
- Capital Properties v. City of Providence, 97-4199 (2001)Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2001-11-06
- Cady v. Imc Mortgage CompanySuperior Court of Rhode Island· 2006-09-25
- McFarland v. Brier, 96-1007 (2001)Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2001-09-17
- Women's Development Corp. v. City of Central Falls, Pc 96-1200 (1998)Superior Court of Rhode Island· 1998-11-16
- Legault v. ARussoD. New Hampshire· 1996-03-29
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 14,197×
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 3,527×
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1978-01-23· cited 3,039×
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court· 1976-04-20· cited 2,133×
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 1,755×
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 1,644×
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 1,609×
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonFirst Circuit· 1978-07-28· cited 1,054×
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborD.C. Circuit· 1980-09-02· cited 989×
- Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinFirst Circuit· 1984-12-05· cited 468×
- John Furtado v. Harold BishopFirst Circuit· 1980-12-11· cited 211×
- Unnamed caseD.C. Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 136×
- Lewis v. KendrickFirst Circuit· 1991-04-26· cited 133×
- William Langton v. Philip Johnston, John Bruder, John Bruder v. Philip Johnston, John Bruder v. Philip JohnstonFirst Circuit· 1991-03-22· cited 123×
- Roberts v. SpaldingNinth Circuit· 1986-02-24· cited 122×
- William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 1982-10-05· cited 104×
- Debra Ackerman v. Western Electric Company, Inc., a Corporation, Debra Ackerman v. Western Electric Company, Inc., a CorporationNinth Circuit· 1988-11-08· cited 102×
- Pontarelli v. StoneFirst Circuit· 1991-04-18· cited 95×
- Culebras Enterprises Corporation v. Miguel A. Rivera-RiosFirst Circuit· 1988-05-09· cited 79×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.