Skip to main content

Citations

  • 231 A.D.2d 407
  • 647 N.Y.S.2d 185
  • 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that sending two allegedly defamatory letters and one fax into New York State did not constitute transactions of business for purpose of establishing personal jurisdiction
  • finding no basis to exercise “long-arm” jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants under New York law where the only tort alleged to have been committed was defamation of character

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.