Pontarelli Limousine, Inc. v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he ALJ need not draw [an accurate and logical] bridge in great detail. He need only ‘minimally articulate his reasons for crediting or rejecting evidence of disability.” (quoting Scivally v. Sullivan, 966 F.2d 1070, 1076 (7th Cir. 1992))
• the court found that the ALJ was never required to give special treatment to a non-treating physician’s opinion when the statement in question was not a “treating physician’s intake note, progression note, or diagnostic impression,” rather it was “an RFC assessment, plain and simple”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).