Ponder v. Conway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that petitioner’s claim Section 470.15(3)(c) was “at most…a violation of New York state statutory law” and therefore not subject to Federal habeas review
• dismissing a reduction-of-sentence claim “as not cognizable on habeas review” because “[a]t most, [petitioner] has asserted a violation of New York state statutory law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).