Ponder v. CACV of Colorado, LLC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing grant of summary judgment because the record was devoid of evidence supporting an essential element of breach of contract claim
• reversing summary judgment to plaintiff in action on debt where record lacked evidence supporting plaintiff’s allegation that it was successor-in-interest to right to recover on debt
• reversing summary judgment to plaintiff in action on debt where record lacked evidence supporting plaintiff’s allegation that it was successor in interest to right to recover on debt
• reversing a grant of summary judgment to a creditor when the record did not support the creditor’s allegation that it was the successor in interest to a right to recover an outstanding debt
• record was devoid of evidence supporting CACV’s allegation that it was the successor in interest to Fleet Bank’s right to recover any outstanding debt from Ponder
• where a party assigns a contractual right to collect payment, including the right to sue for payment, the assignment must be in writing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).