Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/6/2022
Pond v. Pond
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3561
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying appellant relief from judgment because he had not demonstrated that he had a meritorious claim or defense to present if relief was granted, nor had he established grounds for relief under Civ.R. 60(B)(2) or (3).
Judges: Klatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1988-03-23· cited 956×
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court· 1987-11-10· cited 822×
- Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 452×
- Niskanen v. Giant Eagle, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-07-30· cited 105×
- GMAC Mortgage, L.L.C. v. HerringOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-08-06· cited 32×
- Hopkins v. Car Go Self StorageOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-09· cited 5×
- Yurkowski v. Univ. of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-19· cited 3×
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-14· cited 2×
- Concrete, Inc. v. WillowickOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.