Pond v. Pond
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1708
Syllabus
The failure to effect the filing of a transcript of the trial court's proceedings, as is the appellant's duty under App.R. 9(B), requires presuming the regularity of the proceedings below concerning all evidentiary issues raised in the 28 assignments of error in this appeal from a decree of divorce. In the limited areas where review is possible, the record contains no error. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Mentel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roberts v. Kauffman 4 Dayton, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-09· cited 6×
- SHJ Co. v. Avani Hospitality & Fin., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-07· cited 4×
- Smith v. FarmerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-23· cited 4×
- Yaklevich v. DinneenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-23· cited 3×
- Gibson v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-31· cited 1×
- Carter v. RossOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-22
- State v. RohrigOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-25
- Hubbard v. HubbardOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-11
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 2,064×
- Gross v. GrossOhio Supreme Court· 1984-06-13· cited 109×
- Davis v. Immediate Medical Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-10-08· cited 109×
- U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-25· cited 15×
- America's Floor Source, L.L.C. v. Joshua HomesOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-21· cited 10×
- CACH, L.L.C. v. AldermanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-29· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.