Pond Place Partners, Inc. v. Poole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when reviewing the denial of a motion for a directed verdict, this court views the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party
• stating that when ruling on a motion for a directed verdict, the trial court is concerned only with the existence or non-existence of evidence, and this court will only reverse the trial court when there is no evidence to support the ruling below
• \[T]he proper action against a maliciously filed lis pendens is under abuse of process or malicious prosecution.\
• \We find a lis pendens filed in conjunction with an action involving the same real estate is merely another form of pleading.\
• \The jurisdictions are in agreement that the proper action against a maliciously filed lis pendens is under abuse of process or malicious prosecution.\
• “If the evidence as a whole is susceptible of more than one reasonable inference, the case should be submitted to the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).