Pond Creek Coal Co. v. Runyon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that towing company did not have any protected property interest in remaining on police’s list of approved towing and salvage service providers
• finding a towing company failed to allege a property interest in receiving towing calls from the police because it failed to cite any “explicit [ordinance or] regulation” with force of law
• “A person’s interest in a benefit is a property interest for due process purposes if there are such rules or mutually explicit understandings that support his claim of entitlement to the benefit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).