Poncio v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unexplained possession of recently stolen property permits inference that defendant committed the offense in which the property was stolen
• holding that defendant’s unexplained possession of property recently stolen in burglary permits inference that defendant committed burglary
• stating that unexplained possession of property recently stolen in a robbery permits an inference that the defendant is the one who committed the robbery
• holding inference that defendant was burglar was permitted because he pawned property stolen from a burglarized home thirty minutes after the offense
• stating that the unexplained possession of property that has been recently stolen in a burglary permits an inference that the defendant is the one who committed the burglary
• stating that the unexplained possession of property that has been recently stolen in a burglary permits an inference that the defendant is the one who committed the burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).