Ponce v. Oliver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Rule 60(b)(2) requires an appellant to show that “the new evidence is likely to change the outcome”
• finding that Rule 60(b)(2) requires an appellant to show that “the new evidence is likely to change the outcome”
• “To find an abuse of discretion, we must conclude that no reasonable man could agree with the district court.”
• where apart- ments would have been closed anyway because unfit for habitation, alleged discriminatory purpose of landlord in evicting was too attenu- ated
• \Courts have thus applied the Act broadly within its terms.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).