Pompa v. Swanson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in the alternative, that statement that plaintiff was overpaid was opinion as opposed to fact
• holding statement that plaintiff was overpaid made in the context of a union board meeting specifically set to consider whether plaintiff should receive a retirement gift was capable of innocent construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).