Pomona Valley Hospital Med v. Xavier Becerra

Oral argument

• Argued

  90 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an amendment to the challenged statute eliminated any \controversy of the kind that must exist if we are to avoid advisory opinions\
• holding that \speculative contingencies afford no basis for our passing on the substantive issues the appellants would have us decide with respect to the now-amended law of Colorado\ (citations omitted)
• holding that an amendment to the challenged statute eliminated any \controversy of the kind that must exist if we are to avoid advisory opinions\
• holding that a case becomes moot whenever it “los[es] its character as a present, live controversy of the kind that must exist if we are to avoid advisory opinions on abstract propositions of law”
• holding that “speculative contingencies afford no basis for our passing on the substantive issues the appellants would have us decide with respect to the now-amended law of Colorado” (citations omitted)
• holding that a case becomes moot whenever it “los[es] its character as a present, live controversy of the kind that must exist if we are to avoid advisory opinions on abstract propositions of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).