Pommerenke v. Pommerenke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the analysis in Woolley v. Woolley, 3 Va. App. 337, 345, 349 S.E.2d 422, 426 (1986
• “Viewing the totality of the evidence as it relates to other factors in Code § 20-107.3(E

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).