Skip to main content
· 7/7/2006

Pomietlasz v. Smith

Citations

  • 31 A.D.3d 1173
  • 818 N.Y.S.2d 709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion for judgment as a matter of law to defendants because plaintiff's medical expert established elements of malpractice and question of whether malpractice occurred was for the jury to consider
  • denying motion for judgment as a matter of law to defendants because plaintiff's medical expert established elements of malpractice and question of whether malpractice occurred was for the jury to consider

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.