Skip to main content
· 12/29/2003

Pomerantz v. Culinary Institute

Citations

  • 2 A.D.3d 821
  • 770 N.Y.S.2d 424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that when one brother forged his other brother's name in order to convey property that they co-owned to himself, the deed, which was based on forgery, was void ab initio, and the mortgage based on the deed was invalid
  • finding that when one brother forged his other brother’s name in order to convey property that they co-owned to himself, the deed, which was based on forgery, was void ab initio, and the mortgage based on the deed was invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.