Pomales v. Celulares Telefónica, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a single incident of nonphysical harassing conduct was insufficient to establish a claim for hostile work environment
• holding that a single incident of nonphysical harassing conduct was insufficient to establish a claim for hostile work environment
• holding that a single incident of nonphysical harassing conduct was insufficient to establish a claim for hostile work environment
• holding that a single incident of nonphysical harassing conduct was insufficient to establish a claim for hostile work environment
• ruling that employee could not establish retaliation where decisionmaker lacked knowledge of protected conduct and there was \no proof\ that those at the company who did \participated [in] or otherwise influenced\ the decision
• holding that plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case because he produced \no evidence that . . . the CTI employee who discharged [him] had any knowledge that [he had engaged in protected activity]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).