· 7/22/2005
PolyGram Holding, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Citations
- 416 F.3d 29
- 367 U.S. App. D.C. 367
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14931
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the FTC appropriately concluded an agreement to restrain price cutting and advertising violated the FTC Act
- accepting the Commission’s definition of “inherently suspect” as describing restraints previously condemned by both “judicial experience and economic learning”
- “A restraint cannot be justified solely on the ground that it increases the prof- itability of the enterprise . . . .”
- “[A]greements restraining autonomy in pricing and advertising impede the ‘ordinary give and take of the market place.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Edwards, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.