Skip to main content
· 7/22/2005

PolyGram Holding, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Citations

  • 416 F.3d 29
  • 367 U.S. App. D.C. 367
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the FTC appropriately concluded an agreement to restrain price cutting and advertising violated the FTC Act
  • accepting the Commission’s definition of “inherently suspect” as describing restraints previously condemned by both “judicial experience and economic learning”
  • “A restraint cannot be justified solely on the ground that it increases the prof- itability of the enterprise . . . .”
  • “[A]greements restraining autonomy in pricing and advertising impede the ‘ordinary give and take of the market place.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Edwards, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.