Skip to main content
· 4/12/1988

Poluch v. American Fan Co.

Citations

  • 119 F.R.D. 621
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5408
  • 1988 WL 39373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting theory that cooperation clause negates any expectation of confidentiality by insured as “fundamentally unsound”
  • finding the Illinois Supreme Court’s extension of the common interest doctrine “unsound”
  • the rationale which supports the “common interest” exception . . . doesn’t apply if the attorney never represented the party seeking the allegedly privileged material
  • documents generated by Barr and other consultants relating to investigations and to prepare reports responsive to MPCA directives were protected by work-product doctrine
  • cooperation clause did not mention coverage investigations, and court held a cooperation clause would not effect a waiver of attorney-client privilege absent an expressed intent to do so
  • cooperation clause did not mention coverage investigations, and court held a cooperation clause would not effect a waiver of attorney-client privilege absent an expressed intent to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ponsor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.