Skip to main content
· 2/23/2010

Polson v. Bowersox

Citations

  • 595 F.3d 873
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3614
  • 2010 WL 610041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • State habeas proceeding must be filed before AEDPA’s one-year limit for filing Federal habeas action expires
  • “Rule 91 proceedings [are] ‘other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim.’”
  • properly-filed state habeas applications qualify as “other collateral review” under 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(d)(2)
  • properly-filed state habeas applications qualify as “other collateral review” under 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(d)(2)
  • Rule 91 petition tolls the statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy, Beam, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.