Polsky v. BDO Seidman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the class designation \agents\ satisfies Alsup and releases individuals who belong to that class
• the term “agents” was sufficiently specific to identify a class of third-party beneficiaries to a release agreement
• a court “should not impose sanctions on a party who presents objectively reasonable arguments for his position, regardless of whether the arguments are deemed to be unpersuasive or incorrect”
• “[B]y its plain words, section 13-214.2(a) applies to actions based on tort, contract, or otherwise arising from acts or omissions in the performance of professional services involving accounting”
• the class designation “agents” satisfies A/sup and releases individuals who belong to that class

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).