Skip to main content
· 8/8/1986

Polskie Linie Oceaniczne D/B/A Polish Ocean Lines v. Seasafe Transport A/s

Citations

  • 795 F.2d 968
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiffs must respond to fact-based jurisdictional challenges through “affidavits or other competent proof, and [cannot] merely reiterate the factual allegations in the complaint.”
  • noting that, if the defendant rebuts the jurisdictional allegations in the plaintiff’s complaint, “the plaintiff is required to substantiate [its] jurisdictional allegations . . . by affidavits or other competent proof, and not merely reiterate the factual allegations in the complaint.”
  • “A plaintiff has the burden of sustaining validity of service to invoke long-arm jurisdiction in the Florida courts.”
  • ‘‘[T]he plaintiff is required to substantiate the jurisdictional allegations in the complaint by affidavits or other competent proof, and not merely reiterate the factual allegations in the complaint’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Henderson, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.