Skip to main content
· 9/29/2008

Polly v. Estate of Polly

Citations

  • 896 N.E.2d 350
  • 385 Ill. App. 3d 300
  • 324 Ill. Dec. 564
  • 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 945

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims for breach of contract and for an accounting filed by widow seeking 100% of deceased spouse’s earnings during the marriage constituted a claim against the estate within the meaning of section 18-12(b) of the Probate Act
  • “Because the estate here failed to prove that it published and mailed notice as required by section 18-3, only the two-year limitations period of section 18-12(b) applies.”
  • “Because the estate here failed to prove that it published and mailed notice as required by section 18-3, only the two-year limitations period of section 18-12(b) applies.”
  • widow’s claim for breach of prenuptial agreement entitling her to all of husband’s earnings during their 21-year marriage was subject to the two-year limitations period and was time-barred when filed 29 months after husband’s death
  • widow's claim for breach of prenuptial agreement entitling her to all of husband's earnings during their 21-year marriage was subject to the two-year limitations period and was time-barred when filed 29 months after husband's death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.