· 9/29/2008
Polly v. Estate of Polly
Citations
- 896 N.E.2d 350
- 385 Ill. App. 3d 300
- 324 Ill. Dec. 564
- 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 945
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that claims for breach of contract and for an accounting filed by widow seeking 100% of deceased spouse’s earnings during the marriage constituted a claim against the estate within the meaning of section 18-12(b) of the Probate Act
- “Because the estate here failed to prove that it published and mailed notice as required by section 18-3, only the two-year limitations period of section 18-12(b) applies.”
- “Because the estate here failed to prove that it published and mailed notice as required by section 18-3, only the two-year limitations period of section 18-12(b) applies.”
- widow’s claim for breach of prenuptial agreement entitling her to all of husband’s earnings during their 21-year marriage was subject to the two-year limitations period and was time-barred when filed 29 months after husband’s death
- widow's claim for breach of prenuptial agreement entitling her to all of husband's earnings during their 21-year marriage was subject to the two-year limitations period and was time-barred when filed 29 months after husband's death
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolfson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.