Pollum v. Borman’s, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opposing party had inadequate time to prepare a response to testimony based upon a highly controversial procedure
• opposing party had inadequate time to prepare a response to testimony based upon a highly controversial procedure
• reversing the trial court’s decision to admit the testimony of an undisclosed expert witness during plaintiff’s case in chief
• where trial court permitted unlisted witness to testify, this Court concluded that the defendants were entitled to a new trial as the trial court should have delayed trial in order to permit them to depose the witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).