Pollock v. Trustmark Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[n]o case . . . allows the aggregation of claims which seek the same damages in claims under varying theories”
• remanding a case where plaintiff alleged damages of $55,000 and “to reach the jurisdictional amount fees would have to be $20,000,” because “[s]uch fees would be unreasonable for this action and would not be awarded”
• “No case, however, allows the aggregation of claims which seek the same damages in claims under varying theories.”
• “Where there is no dollar amount alleged in the complaint and the action is in federal court by a notice of removal . . .. [t]he court looks first to the complaint, and then to the moving papers, and then to anything else.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).