Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/7/1995
Pollock v. Pollock
Citations
- 889 P.2d 633
- 181 Ariz. 275
- 183 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 32
- 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 21
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the best interests factors are “weighed collectively” and “no single factor is controlling”
- explaining best interests factors are “weighed collectively,” and “no single factor is controlling”
- explaining best interests factors are “weighed collectively,” and “no single factor is controlling”
- custodial parent seeking to move has burden of proving move is in child’s best interests
- no single best- interests factor is dispositive, and all factors should be weighed collectively
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kleinschmidt, Noyes, Kaufman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stout v. StoutNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-04-01· cited 120×
- Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-18· cited 120×
- Pennington v. MarcumKentucky Supreme Court· 2008-10-24· cited 101×
- Dupré v. DupréSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2004-07-30· cited 16×
- Ex Parte MonroeSupreme Court of Alabama· 1999-01-08· cited 14×
- Dupre v. DupreSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2004-07-30· cited 12×
- Dvorak v. AgriBank, FCBNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-04-01
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.