Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/24/1972
Pollock v. Pollock
Citations
- 499 P.2d 231
- 7 Wash. App. 394
- 1972 Wash. App. LEXIS 989
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- separate property deposited into marital bank account was community property where party failed to establish character of funds withdrawn thereafter
- mere assertion that acquisition was by use of separate funds does not overcome the presumption; there must be clear tracing of the separate property source into the controverted asset
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horowitz, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re the Marriage of LeslieCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-04-13· cited 109×
- In Re the Marriage of HadleyWashington Supreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 101×
- Marie Holt Hart v. James P. Hart, IIICourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-03-31· cited 73×
- In re the Marriage of WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-03-30· cited 68×
- In re the Marriage of DoddCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-16· cited 67×
- In Re Marriage of DoddCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-16· cited 65×
- Lodis v. Corbis Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-01-14· cited 53×
- Matter of Marriage of HurdCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-03-15· cited 51×
- Wold v. WoldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-11-20· cited 49×
- Matter of Marriage of Pearson-MainesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-08-09· cited 43×
- In Re the Marriage of ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-07-01· cited 43×
- In re the Marriage of KileCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-04-09· cited 42×
- Northern Commercial Co. v. E. J. Hermann Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-03-22· cited 35×
- In Re the Marriage of HarshmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-07-18· cited 34×
- Beam v. BeamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-09-06· cited 26×
- Courtney v. CourtneyAlaska Supreme Court· 1975-11-07· cited 22×
- In Re the Marriage of BradyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-03-07· cited 20×
- In Re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-04-09· cited 15×
- In Re the Marriage of DalthorpCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-08-07· cited 11×
- Leslie v. VerheyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-04-13· cited 10×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baker v. BakerWashington Supreme Court· 1972-06-15· cited 111×
- DeRevere v. DeRevereCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-11-18· cited 72×
- Hamlin v. MerlinoWashington Supreme Court· 1954-06-17· cited 63×
- Berol v. BerolWashington Supreme Court· 1950-11-16· cited 63×
- DeRuwe v. DeRuweWashington Supreme Court· 1967-11-02· cited 42×
- Morris v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1966-10-06· cited 37×
- Blood v. BloodWashington Supreme Court· 1966-11-03· cited 36×
- In Re Estate of VerbeekCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-03-23· cited 33×
- Abel v. AbelWashington Supreme Court· 1955-11-10· cited 32×
- Mayo v. MayoWashington Supreme Court· 1968-12-13· cited 28×
- Legg v. LeggWashington Supreme Court· 1904-02-04· cited 26×
- In Re Smith's EstateWashington Supreme Court· 1968-04-25· cited 25×
- Lucker v. LuckerWashington Supreme Court· 1967-05-04· cited 24×
- Burch v. RiceWashington Supreme Court· 1950-10-05· cited 23×
- Stacy v. StacyWashington Supreme Court· 1966-05-12· cited 22×
- Neeley v. LocktonWashington Supreme Court· 1964-03-05· cited 21×
- Hogberg v. HogbergWashington Supreme Court· 1964-06-18· cited 18×
- Coons v. CoonsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-12-20· cited 18×
- Keen v. O'ROURKEWashington Supreme Court· 1955-12-01· cited 17×
- Robuck v. RobuckWashington Supreme Court· 1963-09-12· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.