Skip to main content
· 10/7/2013

Pollock v. Oregon

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 123
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 87
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3181
  • 571 U.S. 851
  • 2013 WL 2357951
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a court must uphold a classification “‘if there is any reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification’”
  • rejecting the argument that an account otherwise protected by the fair report privilege was not “fair” because the media outlet did not seek a response from the plaintiff before reporting on the allegations
  • the assertion that someone “actually committed the criminal act of extortion” is “capable of being proven false”
  • New York courts adopt a “liberal interpretation of the ‘fair and true report’ standard of § 74 so as to provide broad protection to news accounts of judicial proceedings.” (alterations adopted and internal quotation omitted)
  • parsing an article summarizing a lawsuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.