· 10/7/2013
Pollock v. Oregon
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 123
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 87
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3181
- 571 U.S. 851
- 2013 WL 2357951
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 5698
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a court must uphold a classification “‘if there is any reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification’”
- rejecting the argument that an account otherwise protected by the fair report privilege was not “fair” because the media outlet did not seek a response from the plaintiff before reporting on the allegations
- the assertion that someone “actually committed the criminal act of extortion” is “capable of being proven false”
- New York courts adopt a “liberal interpretation of the ‘fair and true report’ standard of § 74 so as to provide broad protection to news accounts of judicial proceedings.” (alterations adopted and internal quotation omitted)
- parsing an article summarizing a lawsuit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.